I agree that population growth was the most significant development of the Classical period to some extent. I think that it was more the consequences that were a result of the population growth. For example, there was deforestation in order to provide enough resources for the new population quantity. Also, more big cities were created to support the new population quantity as well. But, an advantage that was made was that with new population increases came the increase of collective learning as well. A few of the reasons behind the population surge were the use of farming and breeding animals to do things humans normally couldn't, or could but then would have time for other labor. As well as the invention of iron, which provided the iron plow, and weapons. And as well as better crops were produced that had more calories in it, and larger quantity of food was being grown. So no, I don't believe that population growth was the biggest change in the classical period. I believe it's because of the reasons behind it, and the consequences of it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I agree with the fact that poulation was indeed important, but I disagree that it was the most important advance during the classical period. However, you obviously used your notes very well. Good work.
And yeah cause the be and there were not but however there could not so there will not see and be what were that them.
hi jenny!!!!!
yea i agree with you completely. I don't understand ben's comment but whatever. anyway ur blog is really good!!!!
I agree with wat u wrote! Wow, i never really thought of this topic like that =P
its really goodd
hey jenny!
you did a really good job.
i agree with you (:
wow. jenny im very impressed with your blog. you did a great job and i understand your point :D GREAT.
Post a Comment